ESA's Future Launcher Systems

Which will be the future launcher systems for Europe?Liquid Fly-Back Boosters (LFBBs) or Reusable First
To answer this question ESA started in 2004 theStage (RFS). As the Russians explore the capabilities
Future Launcher Preparatory Program (or FLPP). Butof Fly-Back Boosters since several years, a
let us first look at the current situation.cooperation between Europe and Russia is considered
Currently ESA has access to space through thefrom the start on.
Ariane-5 launcher, operated by its commercial offsetAs these designs, mainly the Fly-Back Boosters, are
Arianespace. Developed as a cheaper and moresomewhat conventional, the cost reduction is not for
powerful successor of the very successful launchersure. In contrast, the more complex reusable
family Ariane-4, the Ariane-5 is available in threetechnology is still a major barrier. That's why ESA will
models. The generic version GS, the heavy-lift modelalso investigate and test technologies to reduce this
ECA and a modified vehicle for transporting the ISScomplexity. For example there are already structures
supply craft ATV, called Ariane-5 ES-ATV.in evaluation and testing with embedded fiber-optic
Through the alliance, called Starsem, of Arianespace,health monitoring systems.
EADS, and Russian partners, ESA can and does alsoThe most advanced concepts are certainly fully
use the Soyuz launchers, especially for interplanetaryreusable Two Stage to Orbit (TSTO) concepts.
probes. Currently, the Kourou spaceport gets anEspecially for this kind of launchers, as also for a
additional launch pad for the Soyuz rocket, so in futureReusable First Stage for a semi-reusable concept,
it will possible to launch the Soyuz from theinvestigation in high performance reusable engines are
equator-near Kourou with an increased payload.seen as a key objective.
For smaller payloads ESA develops the VegaUp to today, only the Space Shuttle and the Energia
launcher, consisting of three solid propellant stages andBuran spacecrafts used reusable engines. Both are
one liquid propellant stage. The solid rocket engines areseen as robust but also as technically demanding and
based on the Ariane-5 booster engines. It is planned torelatively expensive.
first-launch the Vega in 2008.If SpaceX with its Merlin engine, which also should be
Recently ESA announced a cooperation with thereusable, can achieve a successful complexity and
Russian Space Agency to build a new spacecraftcost reduction, time will still have to tell. An analysis of
together. As this craft needs a new launcher or atthe possible cost reductions is underway at the Space
least a modified launcher, ESA could also use thatFellowship Forum. The potential cost reduction is surely
launcher for future payloads. The rockets currently inthe highest but the development costs will also be the
consideration are a modified Soyuz launcher, calledhighest.
Soyuz-3, a further improved Ariane, or anotherAnother key objective would be the development (and
launcher currently in development, the Angara-3.maturing) of light-weight reusable stage structures with
These launchers will give Europe space access forcryogenic propellant tanks. Also the second stage
the next several years. As the private launcherwould need a reentry system, which would add
business is yet unclear, Europe will need a newstructural mass. Additionally reentry systems showed
launcher family around 2015 to 2020.to be complex and very labor-intensive for reuse.
The FLPP calls for a future launcher to be operationalStructural mass and additional operational costs for
around 2020. Currently the first studies are conducted.inspection and re-qualification of the system after a
Now we will take a look at the potential launchers,launch are the main difficulties to handle with reusable
reusable and expendable both.systems, as compared to an expendable vehicle.
One important condition for the whole program is theAs the reusability adds structural mass, e.g. increasing
use of matured technologies and concepts. Designsthe structural and engine robustness for withstanding
like Single Stage to Orbit (SSTO) vehicles orseveral launches or adding health monitoring systems,
air-breathing propulsion systems like scramjets are notit's necessary to focus on materials and systems
considered because they are not yet proven andscience. Inspection and particularly re-qualification of the
sufficiently developed.hardware is an expensive area as this work is very
The most conservative concepts are expendablelabor-intensive.
launchers. Aside from a payload increase, they wouldAlso new procedures are necessary to be developed.
incorporate better and especially cheaperHow much of damage to a certain part is tolerable
manufacturing and components like low cost engines.before it will be necessary to replace it? In aviation we
But as the launchers would be rather conventional, thehave this expertise today, we can predict for example
launch costs would be not very different from today's.how a small crack will develop and when it's
If that would be (on the background of a potentialnecessary to replace or repair it. In the aerospace
emerging private rocket market) enough to competesector we nearly have no such experience yet.
with others, that is likely to be a question. TheThe clear advantage if all these challenges are
advantages clearly would be no dependancies on newmastered is a low-cost high-performance launcher
breakthrough technologies and a manageable budget.system which will strengthen Europe's future role in
On the other side, reusable concepts are investigated.spaceflight.
The first idea are semi-reusable rockets with so called